![]() ![]() Some film lovers want the film to be remade, but Harper Lee wouldn’t allow it. The use of shadows wouldn’t have been noticed if only a little. These shadows would not have been nearly as effective in a color film because there would be too many colors and tones to attract attention from the shadows. Mulligan uses this effect to show the suspicion that was felt about black people during that time, and the fact that people didn’t trust black people, especially black men. ![]() One cannot help but notice the difference in the people with dark skin, and the films use of shadow makes them look almost scary. The black characters seem to stand out in a sea of white, showing the viewers how black people were viewed by society at that time. The black and white film shows contrast between the white characters and the black characters. Viewers see it from Scout’s point of view. It seems kind of fuzzy, like memories can be. For one thing, the black and white set makes it seem like the story is being told in the past, as though it is all from Scout’s memory. Would the film have had the same impact had it been filmed in color? Probably not. The use of no color intensified the aspect of segregation, which allowed viewers to almost feel what it would have been like to live in the American South during that time. This choice influenced the way the film is viewed, both by viewers and by critics. Yet, director Robert Mulligan filmed it in black and white format. The film was released after the introduction of color films. The 1962 film, To Kill a Mockingbird was based on the novel by Harper Lee. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |